Modeling of the spatial distribution of Trachycarpus fortunei (Hook.) H.Wendl and Paysandisia archon Burmeister
https://doi.org/10.36305/0513-1634-2022-145-25-36
Abstract
Results of modeling of the spatial distribution of Trachycarpus fortunei (Hook.) H.Wendl and Paysandisia archon Burmeister are given. Predictor variables have made the most significant contribution to modeling the spatial distribution of Trachycarpus fortunei and Paysandisia archon are the amount and seasonal distribution of precipitation and the built-up area (EarthEnv, class 9). This species has begun to occupy wetter growing conditions in the secondary range than in its native range. The pest Paysandisia archon unintentionally introduced to the south of Russia's Black Sea Region, started to act as a biotic factor limiting its spread of Trachycarpus fortunei in the ecosystems of secondary range experiencing more significant anthropogenic impact.
References
1. Егошин А.В. Структура, состав и пространственное распределение чужеродного компонента флоры юга Черноморского побережья Краснодарского края // Russian Journal of Ecosystem Ecology. - 2021. - Vol. 6 (1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21685/2500-0578-2021-1-2
2. Карпун Ю.Н. Сокровища парков Сочи. - Сочи, 1998. - 172 с.
3. Amatulli, G., Domisch, S., Tuanmu, M.-N., Parmentier, B., Ranipeta, A., Malczyk, J., and Jetz, W. A suite of global, cross-scale topographic variables for environmental and biodiversity modeling. Scientific. - 2018.
4. Broennimann O., Guisan A. Predicting current and future biological invasions: both native and invaded ranges atter // Biology letters. - 2008. - № 4. - P.585-589.
5. Callaway R.M., Maron J.L. What have exotic plant invasion taught us over the past 20 years? // Trends in Ecology and Evolution. - 2006. - № 21. - P. 369-374.
6. Fehr V., Burga C. Aspects and causes of earlier and current spread of Trachycarpus fortunei in the forests of southern Ticino and northern Lago Maggiore (Switzerland, Italy). Palms. - 2016. - № 60. - P. 125-136.
7. Mitchell C.E., Agrawal A.A., Bever,J.D., Gilbert G.S., Hufbauer R.A., Klironomos J.N. et al. 2006. Biotic interactions and plant invasions // Ecology Letters. - Volume 9. - P. 726-740.
8. Peterson A.T., Soberón J. Ecological Niches and Geographic Distributions / Monographs in Population Biology. - 2011. - № 49. - P.315.
9. Peterson, A.T., Vieglais, D.A. Predicting species invasions using ecological niche modeling: New approaches from bioin-formatics attack a pressing problem // Bioscience. - 2001. - № 51. - P.363-371.
10. Pulliam H.R. Grinnellian and Eltonian niches and geographic distributions of species // Ecology Letters. - 2007. - Volume 10. - Issue 12. - P.1115-1123
11. Pulliam H.R. On the relationship between niche and distribution // Ecology Letters. - 2000. - Volume 3. - Issue 4. - P. 349-361.
12. Reid S. and Moran H. Palm borer Paysandisia archon November // Department for Environment Food & Rural Affairs. - 2009. - P.4.
13. Title P.O., Bemmels J.B. ENVIREM: an expanded set of bioclimatic and topographic variables increases flexibility and improves performance of ecological niche modeling. Ecography. - 2018. - № 41. - P.291-307.
14. Tuanmu, M.-N. and W. Jetz. A global 1-km consensus land-cover product for biodiversity and ecosystem modeling. Global Ecology and Biogeography. - 2014. - № 23(9). - P. 1031-1045.
15. Cola V.D., Broennimann O. Blaise Petitpierre ecospat: an R package to support spatial analyses and modeling of species niches and distributions // Ecography. - 2016. -Volume 40. - Issue 6. - P. 774-787
Review
For citations:
Egoshin A.V. Modeling of the spatial distribution of Trachycarpus fortunei (Hook.) H.Wendl and Paysandisia archon Burmeister. Bulletin of the State Nikitsky Botanical Gardens. 2022;(145):25-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36305/0513-1634-2022-145-25-36
Views:
48
Email this article 