Evaluation of various methods of grafting miniature roses on non-rooted cuttings in order to obtain stem forms
https://doi.org/10.25684/0513-1634-2024-150-69-75
Abstract
Studies have been conducted on the possibility of accelerating the production of stem seedlings of 5 cultivars of miniature roses. Two species were used as rootstock – Rosa canina L. and R. multiflora Thunb. in the form of unrooted cuttings of three different lengths. According to the results of the research, it was revealed that cuttings without prior rooting are more promising for the graft component. They are cut from the species R. multiflora. When comparing the rootability of this species of R. canina, they revealed a high percentage of root formation. It was found that cuttings with the longest length of 40 cm show the best results in all variants of the study. The obtained data on the grafting of shoots in all the studied rose cultivars, which were carried out on unrooted cuttings of the species R. multiflora, turned out to be promising. The effect on the process of splicing the rootstock with the graft was largely influenced by the method of conducting the grafting operation. Such a method of inoculation as improved copulation in the blood showed the best results in all the studied variants. The possibility of accelerated production of stem seedlings of rose cultivars from the miniature group has been confirmed by simultaneous rooting of the rootstock and splicing of the scion with the rootstock in closed ground conditions.
About the Authors
I. A. BondorinaRussian Federation
A. V. Pashtetsky
Russian Federation
A. V. Kabanov
Russian Federation
Ju. A. Khokhlacheva
Russian Federation
References
1. Бондорина И.А. Основные принципы повышения декоративных свойств древесных растений методами прививки. – Дисс. … канд. биол. наук. – М., 2000. – 110 с.
2. Васильева О.Ю., Амброс Е.В., Козлова М.В. Адаптивный потенциал подвоя Rosa canina L., полученного in vitro, в условиях Юга Западной Сибири // Сельскохозяйственная биология. – 2022. – Т. 57, № 3. – С. 579-590. DOI: 10.15389/agrobiology.2022.3.579rus
3. Доспехов Б.А. Методика полевого опыта (с основами статистической обработки результатов исследований). – М.: Агропромиздат, 1985. – 351 с.
4. Кръстев М.Т. Прививка как метод размножения и улучшения декоративности древесных растений // Проблемы рекреационных растений. – Чебоксары, 1984. – С. 111-115.
5. Кръстев М.Т., Бондорина И.А., Протас С.А. Биологические основы прививки древесных растений при интродукции. – М.: Товарищество научных изданий КМК, 2014. – 164 с.
6. Михайлов Н.Л. Выращивание штамбовых подвоев для роз. – М.: Б.и., 1958. – 20 с.
7. Окунева И.Б. Особенности вегетативного размножения сортовой сирени. – Дисс. … канд. биол. наук. – М., 1988. – 155 с.
8. Assunção M., Tedesco S., Fevereiro P. Molecular aspects of grafting in woody plants // Annual Plant Reviews Online. – 2021. – Vol. 4(1). – P. 87-126. DOI: 10.1002/9781119312994.apr0751
9. Balfagón D., Terán F., Reis de Oliveira T., Santa-Catarina C., Aurelio Gómez-Cadenas A. Citrus rootstocks modify scion antioxidant system under drought and heat stress combination // Plant Cell Reports. – 2021. – Vol. 41. – P. 593-602. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-021-02744-y
10. Baron D., Amaro A., Pina A., Ferreira G. An overview of grafting re-establishment in woody fruit species // Scientia Horticulturae. – 2019. – Vol. 243. – P. 84-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.08.012
11. Castellano-Hinojosa A., Meyering B., Nuzzo A., Strauss S., Albrecht U. Effect of plant biostimulants on root and plant health and the rhizosphere microbiome of citrus trees in huanglongbing-endemic conditions // Trees. – 2021. – Vol. 35(5). – P. 15251539. DOI: 10.1007/s00468-021-02133-8
12. Davies F., Fann Y.-S. New propagation practices show promise for field-grown roses // American Nurseryman. – 1983. – Vol. 157(3). – P. 73-77.
13. Li W., Chen S., Liu Y., Wang L., Jiang J., Zhao S., Fang W., Chen F., Guan Z. Long-distance transport RNAs between rootstocks and scions and graft hybridization // Planta. – 2022. – Vol. 255(5). – P. 96. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-022-03863-w
14. Monder M., Niedzielski, M., Wolinski K. Effect of phenological stage and rooting enhancers on physiological parameters in stem cuttings in the process of rhizogenesis of Rosa × alba ‘Maiden’s Blush’ // Agriculture. – 2020. – Vol. 10(11). – P. 1-18. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture10110572
15. Ohkawa K. Cutting grafts as a means to propagate greenhouse roses // Science Horticulture. – 1980. – Vol. 13(2). – P. 91-199.
16. Padró M.D.A., Caboni E., Morin K.A.S., Mercado M.A.M., Olalde-Portugal V. Effect of Bacillus subtilis on antioxidant enzyme activities in tomato grafting // Peer J. – 2021. – Vol. 9. – P. 10984. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10984
17. Qi W., Zhang C., Wang W., Cao Z., Li S., Li H., Zhu W., Huang Y., Bao M., He Y., Zheng R. Transcriptome analysis of different heat stress responses between self-root grafting line and heterogeneous grafting line in rose // Horticultural Plant Journal. – 2021. – Vol. 7(3). – P. 243-255. DOI: 10.1016/j.hpj.2021.03.004
18. Solgi M., Taghizadeh M., Bagheri H. Response of black mulberry onto white mulberry rootstock to stenting (cutting-grafting) techniques and IBA concentrations // Ornamental Horticulture. – 2022. – Vol. 28(1). – P. 78-84. DOI: 10.1590/2447-536X.V28I1.2413
19. Sun J., Hu R., Lv F., Yang Y., Tang Z., Zheng G., Li J., Tian H., Xu Y., Li. S. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals stem secondary growth of grafted Rosa rugosa ‘Rosea’ scion and R. multiflora ‘Innermis’ rootstock // Genes. – 2020. – Vol. 11(2). – P. 228. DOI: 10.3390/genes11020228
20. Vahdati K., Sarikhani S., Mohammad Mehdi Arab M.M., Leslie C.A., Dandekar A.M., Aletà N., Bielsa B., Gradziel T.M., Montesinos Á.I., Rubio-Cabetas M.J., Sideli G.M., Serdar U., Akyüz B., Beccaro G.L., Donno D., Rovira M., Ferguson L., Akbari M., Sheikhi A., Adriana F. Sestras A.F., Kafkas S., Paizila A., Roozban M.R., Kaur A., Panta S., Zhang L., Sestras R.E., Mehlenbacher S.A. Advances in rootstock breeding of nut trees: Objectives and strategies // Plants. – 2021. – Vol. 10(11). – P. 2234. DOI: 10.3390/plants10112234
21. Van de Pol РА., Brenkelaar А. Stenting of roses; a method for quick propagation by simultaneously cutting and grafting // Scientia Horticulturae. – 1982. – Vol. 17. – P. 187-196.
22. Yuan H., Tai P., Gustave W., Xue F., Sun L. Grafting as a mitigation strategy to reduce root-to-shoot cadmium translocation in plants of Solanaceae family // Journal of Cleaner Production. – 2021. – Vol. 319. – P. 128708. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128708
23. Zhang X., Feng Y., Khan K., Ullah N., Li Z., Zaheer S., Zhou R., Zhang Z. Quantitative proteomics-based analysis reveals molecular mechanisms of chilling tolerance in grafted cotton seedlings // Agronomy. – 2022. – Vol. 12(5). – P. 1152. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy12051
Review
For citations:
Bondorina I.A., Pashtetsky A.V., Kabanov A.V., Khokhlacheva J.A. Evaluation of various methods of grafting miniature roses on non-rooted cuttings in order to obtain stem forms. Bulletin of the State Nikitsky Botanical Gardens. 2024;(150):69-75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25684/0513-1634-2024-150-69-75